- LIS-Forum - ncsi.iisc.ernet.in

CDSware News: CDSware v0.1.0 released
by Saiful Amin 06 Dec '03

06 Dec '03

Subject: CDSware News: CDSware v0.1.0 released From: Tibor Simko <tibor.simko(a)cern.ch> To: project-cdsware-announce(a)cern.ch Date: Thu, December 4, 2003 7:53 pm -------------------------------------------------------------------- CDSware News: CDSware v0.1.0 released December 4, 2003 http://cdsware.cern.ch/news/ -------------------------------------------------------------------- CDSware v0.1.0 was released on December 4th, 2003. What's new: * development branch release * search engine redesign to yield five times more search performance for larger sites (WebSearch, BibWords) * fulltext indexation of PDF, PostScript, MS Word, MS PowerPoint and MS Excel files (WebSearch) * integrated combined metadata/fulltext/citation search (WebSearch) * multi-stage search guidance in cases of no exact match (WebSearch) * OAI-PMH harvestor (BibHarvest) * bibliographic task scheduler (BibSched) * automatic daemon mode of the indexer, the formatter and the collection cache generator (BibWords, BibFormat, WebSearch) * user management and session handling rewrite (WebSession) * user personalization, document baskets and notification alert system (WebBasket, WebAlert) * role-based access control engine (WebAccess) * internationalization of the interface started (currently with Czech, German, English, Spanish, French, Italian, Portuguese, Russian, and Slovak support) * web page design update (WebStyle) * introduction of programmer-oriented technical documentation corner (WebHelp) * source tree reorganization, mod_python technology adopted for most of the modules Download: <http://cdsware.cern.ch/download/cdsware-0.1.0.tar.gz> Notes: This is a development branch release. It is not meant to replace CDSware 0.0.9. Users of 0.0.9 are advised to wait for the next stable release. Users of 0.0.9+ are advised to upgrade to 0.1.0. As of this release we are adopting the classical stable/development branch version numbering scheme spread in the GNU/Linux world and elsewhere, with even minor versions denoting stable branch releases and odd minor versions denoting development releases. For more details, see <http://cdsware.cern.ch:8000/hacking/releases.html>. Known problems: WebSubmit is not working properly yet. Several admin-level functionality of 0.0.9 is missing in 0.1.0 yet. The task scheduler and RBAC authentication engines are functional but not yet called by all the clients. These issues will be subsequently dealt with in the next releases of the 0.1.x development branch. What's next: Fixing known problems described above. Stabilizing the 0.1.x tree. Continuing with the internationalization of the interface. Introducing BibIndex for better phrase indexing and browsing. -- [Please http://remember.to/edit_messages ] Saiful Amin c/o, Learning Resource Center Indian School of Business Gachibowli Hyderabad - 500019 Ph. +91-40-2318-7963/7999 ________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! India Mobile: Download the latest polyphonic ringtones. Go to http://in.mobile.yahoo.com

1 0

Subbiah Arunachalam Co-Director of CogPrints for Journals
by Mailing List Manager 05 Dec '03

05 Dec '03

It is my great pleasure and honour to announce that India's and the Developing World's great advocate for open access, Subbiah Arunachalam has become Co-Director of the CogPrints Archive http://cogprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/ Professor Arunachalam will be specifically in charge of the growing Journals sector of CogPrints: * JOURNALS o Asian Student Medical Journal o Behavioral & Brain Sciences o Calicut Medical Journal o Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal o Internet Health o Medical Education Online + MEO Peer Reviewed + MEO PrePrint o Online Journal of Health and Allied Sciences o Psycoloquy This sector hosts online journals (in any discipline) that wish to self-archive their contents centrally. This sector grew out of a natural evolution of CogPrints in a transitional period when distributed institutional self-archiving is replacing central CogPrints-style self-archiving. "Central vs. Distributed Archives" http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/0293.html "Central versus institutional self-archiving" http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/3208.html Thanks to OAI-interoperability, all these archives are now equivalent, interoperable, and hence integrable into one big virtual archive in OAI-space -- e.g. http://oaister.umdl.umich.edu/o/oaister/ As a result, more and more cognitive science papers will be self-archived in their authors' own institutional OAI archives (for which the Eprints.org software is an adaptation of the CogPrints software: http://software.eprints.org/#ep2 ). It is only natural, then, that CogPrints should make its central archiving capacity available to those who need it, including authors whose institutions do not yet have their own Eprint Archives (or authors without institutions) and journals that wish to self-archive their contents centrally. No one on the planet is more closely and deeply identified with the cause of researchers and journals who lack the resources to make their output openly accessible than is Professor Arunachalam. We are deeply grateful for his generous collaboration. Stevan Harnad NOTE: A complete archive of the ongoing discussion of providing open access to the peer-reviewed research literature online is available at the American Scientist Open Access Forum (98 & 99 & 00 & 01 & 02 & 03): http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/september98-forum.html http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/index.html Post discussion to: september98-forum(a)amsci-forum.amsci.org Dual Open-Access-Provision Policy: BOAI-2 ("gold"): Publish your article in a suitable open-access journal whenever one exists. BOAI-1 ("green"): Otherwise, publish your article in a suitable toll-access journal and also self-archive it. http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Temp/berlin.htm http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Temp/self-archiving_files/Slide0026.gif http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Temp/self-archiving_files/Slide0021.gif http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Temp/self-archiving_files/Slide0024.gif http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Temp/self-archiving_files/Slide0028.gif

1 0

Library Book Racks
by Mailing List Manager 05 Dec '03

05 Dec '03

Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 22:05:32 -0800 (PST) From: gayathri sen <gayatsen(a)yahoo.com> Dear friend, You need to get 25 double sided racks of the standard size if you want to make provision for 10,000 books. Appro. 200 books on one side of the shelf. Regarding Catalogue cabinet you must insist that a PC given to the library to make entry of records. In these days of library automation and networking no new library should go for old method of catalogue cards and filing. UGC(INFLIBNET) wants to network all university and college libraries and may be want to find out how forward looking you are. About your approach to library management. However, you can also calculate the no. of cards that can be held in a tray, and give an second answer in continuation to the online catalogue. All the best, Gayathri Sen

1 0

Emilda: Free library management tool
by Shyam Prasad pujar 05 Dec '03

05 Dec '03

Dear Members, Emilda is a fully featured electronic library management tool that includes Web-OPAC, circulation functions, user management and book information retrieval from databases around the world. This is a "free" library system released under the GPL license. It is a web based system works on a Linux platform. As per the developers it can work on other platforms as well with modifications in source code. The software can be downloded from the following website. http://www.realnode.fi As per developers, these are pre-releases of stable versions and are not recommended for other use than testing or evaluation. Regards, S.M. Pujar ********************************************************************** Shamprasad M. Pujar Assistant Librarian Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research Gen. Vaidya Marg, Film City Road Goregaon (East) MUMBAI-400 065 India %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% * Phone: (022) 28400919-21 Extn: 514 * * Fax: (022) 28402752 * * E-mail: pujar(a)igidr.ac.in * * URL: http://www.igidr.ac.in * %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1 0

New Age Navigation: Innovative e-Journal Interfaces
by Gerry Mckiernan 04 Dec '03

04 Dec '03

_New Age Navigation: Innovative E-Journal Interfaces_ I am pleased to announce the formal publication of my latest Magnus Opus [:-) "New Age Navigation: Innovative Information Interfaces for Electronic Journals" _The Serials Librarian_ 45(2)(2003): 87-123 ABSTRACT. While it is typical for electronic journals to offer conventional search features similar to those provided by electronic databases, a select number of e-journals have also made available higher-level access options as well. In this article, we review several novel technologies and implementations that creatively exploit the inherent potential of the digital environment to further facilitate use of e-collections. We conclude with speculation on the functionalities of a next-generation e-journal interface that are likely to emerge in the near future. A offprint/preprint copy of the article is available at [ http://www.public.iastate.edu/~gerrymck/NewAge.pdf ] The article served as the basis of a presentation I gave at the _Internet Librarian 2003 Conference_ [ http://www.infotoday.com/il2003/] in Monterey, California in early November. [BTW: A *Most* Excellent Conference] [ http://www.infotoday.com/il2003/presentations/default.htm ] The conference version of my presentation is available at [http://www.public.iastate.edu/~gerrymck/NewAgeIL.ppt ] [*********1.6 MB FILE****************************] and the Director's Cut [:-) at [http://www.public.iastate.edu/~gerrymck/NewAge.ppt ] **********[LARGE FILE 3.4 MB]****************** As Aways, I'd appreciate Any and All comments, queries, critiques, questions, or Cosmic Insights relating to the themes of Such Musings {:-) . Regards, /Gerry Gerry McKiernan New Age Librarian Iowa State University Ames AI 50011 gerrymck(a)iastate.edu As we know, There are known knowns. There are things we know we know. We also know There are known unknowns. That is to say We know there are some things We do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns, The ones we don't know We don't know. Donald Rumsfeld -Feb. 12, 2002, Department of Defense news briefing [http://slate.msn.com/id/2081042/ ]

1 0

FASTER, BETTER, CHEAPER: OPEN-SOURCE PRACTICES MAY HELP IMPROVE S OFTWARE ENGINEERING
by Mailing List Manager 04 Dec '03

04 Dec '03

Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 14:02:38 +0530 From: Subbiah Arunachalam <arun(a)mssrf.res.in> National Science Foundation 4201 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA 22230 "Where discoveries begin" For Immediate Release December 3, 2003 NSF Media Contact: David Hart, 703-292-7737, <mailto:dhart@nsf.gov> dhart(a)nsf.gov FASTER, BETTER, CHEAPER: OPEN-SOURCE PRACTICES MAY HELP IMPROVE SOFTWARE ENGINEERING ARLINGTON, Va.-Walt Scacchi of the University of California, Irvine, and his colleagues are conducting formal studies of the informal world of open-source software development, in which a distributed community of developers produces software source code that is freely available to share, study, modify and redistribute. They're finding that, in many ways, open-source development can be faster, better and cheaper than the "textbook" software engineering often used in corporate settings. In a series of reports posted online (see <http://www.isr.uci.edu> www.isr.uci.edu), Scacchi is documenting how open-source development breaks many of the software engineering rules formulated during 30 years of academic research. Far from finding that open-source development is just software engineering poorly done, Scacchi and colleagues show that it represents a new approach based on community building and other socio-technical mechanisms that might benefit traditional software engineering. "Free and open-source software development is faster, better and cheaper in building a community and at reinforcing and institutionalizing a culture for how to develop software," said Scacchi, a senior research scientist at UC Irvine's Institute for Software Research who has taught software engineering for two decades. "We're not ready to assert that open-source development is the be-all end-all for software engineering practice, but there's something going on in open-source development that is different from what we see in the textbooks." Scacchi and his colleagues are studying open-source projects to understand when the processes and practices work and when they don't. These findings may help businesses understand the implications of adopting open-source methods internally or investing in external open-source communities. The studies are supported by several Information Technology Research awards from the National Science Foundation (NSF), the independent federal agency that supports fundamental research and education across all fields of science and engineering. Three projects-one by Les Gasser at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, and Scacchi, one by Scacchi and John Noll of Santa Clara University and one led by UC Irvine's Richard Taylor-are applying the lessons learned from open-source practices to create new design, process-management and knowledge- management tools for large-scale, multi-organization development projects. "In many ways, open-source development projects are treasure troves of information for how large software systems get developed in the wild, if you will," Scacchi said. Open-source project databases, for example, record hundreds of thousands of bug reports. Gasser and Scacchi are mining those databases to try to understand how bug reporting relates to software quality or if it has other implications. "These are unprecedented data sets in software engineering research," he said. "We're thinking of these databases in a 'national treasure' sense. We're never going to get this from a corporate source." Not all open-source projects are alike, however. A small number of open-source projects have become well known, but the vast majority never get off the ground, according to Scacchi. He and his colleagues are trying to understand how successful projects, such as the Linux Kernel, grow from a few individuals to a community of a thousand developers. Similarly, they are trying to determine whether or not opensource software is appropriate for complex, fixed requirements projects of interest only to a limited community (for example, air defense radar software). It is unclear whether such systems can or will ever be developed in an open manner, or whether open-source approaches would falter, while traditional software engineering approaches would succeed. To explore the breadth of open-source activity, Scacchi and colleagues are looking at more than a hundred projects in several categories: network games, Internet and Web infrastructure, academic and scientific software and industry-sponsored activities. The network games include PlaneShift, Crystal Space, and game "mods" for Epic Games' Unreal or id Software's Quake game engines. Internet and Web infrastructure projects range from Linux Kernel, Apache and Mozilla to GNU Enterprise. In another project, Mark Ackerman at the University of Michigan and Scacchi are examining how scientists working in fields like X-ray astronomy and deep-space imaging are using opensource software to support basic scientific research. More recent efforts are examining industry-sponsored open-source projects including NetBeans from Sun Microsystems and Eclipse from IBM. "The software-intensive systems in today's world have become so complex that we need every available design tool at our disposal," said Suzanne Iacono, NSF program director. "Open source development has achieved some remarkable successes, and we need to learn from these successes as our systems become increasingly distributed, complex and heterogeneous. Traditional software engineering methods were originally developed for single- system design and development." The researchers have so far identified a number of ways in which open-source development surpasses traditional software engineering. In successful projects, open-source development is faster in the pace of evolution and the rate of software growth. Expertise also spreads faster through the community. The researchers also report that open-source development is better because of, among other features, its informality, which enables continuous system design and more agile development processes. And open-source is cheaper because the development tools are often open-source themselves and because other costs are often subsidized by corporate donations, volunteer efforts and "gifts" for the collective good. "Open-source is not a poor version of software engineering, but a private-collective approach to large-software systems," Scacchi said. "This is perhaps a new fertile ground between software engineering and the world of opensource and may be what the open- source community can contribute to new academic and commercial development efforts." ### NSF PR03-132 NSF Program Officer: Suzanne Iacono, 703-292-8930, <mailto:siacono@nsf.gov> siacono(a)nsf.gov Principal Investigator: Walt Scacchi, 949-824-4130, <mailto:wscacchi@ics.uci.edu> wscacchi(a)ics.uci.edu ISR Open-Source Software Development Research at UC Irvine: <http://www.isr.uci.edu/research-open-source.html> http://www.isr.uci.edu/research-open-source.html

1 0

Sepcial Lecture
by DRTC General 04 Dec '03

04 Dec '03

INDIAN STATISTICAL INSTITUTE Documentation Research and Training Centre 8th Mile, Mysore Road, Bangalore 560059 CORDIALLY INVITES YOU TO THE Special Lecture on Term Frequency for Information Retrieval By Dr. Carolyn Watters Professor Faculty of Computer Science Dalhousie University, Canada B3H 1W5 On 5th December, 2003, 2.30 PM At DRTC Class Room Indian Statistical Institute Bangalore 560059 I.K RAVICHANDRA RAO Professor and Head, DRTC

1 0

RE: [LIS-Forum] UGC-Net Question
by Mailing List Manager 03 Dec '03

03 Dec '03

Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 17:30:41 +0530 From: manish mankad <Manish.Mankad(a)unilever.com> For the q.1, I shall assume following dimensions as the standard one: 1 rack of 6 ft height, 2 ft depth and 3 ft width and is back to back. Each side will accomodate 6 shelves and thus both will have 12 shelves for storage. Each shelf will accomodate around 30 bks of average size and thus one rack can accomodate 360 books. With the same calculation, it will require 28 shelves to accomodate all the 10000 bk. Regards. -Manish Mankad Information Executive Hindustan Lever Research Centre, BD Sawant Marg Andheri (E), Mumbai, 400 099 INDIA ext. 208/330 (022) 28276 208 28276 330

2 1

Forwarded mail....
by Mailing List Manager 03 Dec '03

03 Dec '03

Here is a press release on a meeting to be held in Geneva on 11 December 2003. "A growing number of scientists worldwide are actively promoting 'open access' to the scientific literature. This means toll-free online access to the full-texts of all refereed research articles. At present, except the fraction of articles for which a suitable open-access journal already exists today (<5%), research is only accessible if the researcher's institution can afford to pay for the toll-access journal in which it is published (>95%). As a result, most of the potential users of research -- and especially those in developing countries -- are unable to access most research. This represents a great loss to both research-providers and research-users, and hence to the progress and benefits of research itself. Fortunately, the Internet and Web technologies have at last opened up the possibility for those researchers whose institutions cannot afford the toll-access version of any article to use instead the open-access version, self-archived on the author's own institutional website. The provision of open access to their own refereed research output by researchers and their institutions needs systematic worldwide promotion. We are holding a three-hour meeting on open-access provision at Geneva as a side event at WSIS. Please publicise the meeting. More important, read and write about the substantial benefits of open access for the progress and benefits of science." (For some useful information: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/ )

1 0

Archives set up by funding agencies!
by Mailing List Manager 03 Dec '03

03 Dec '03

Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 17:58:44 +0530 From: Subbiah Arunachalam <arun(a)mssrf.res.in> Here is some model DST, DBT, UGC, CSIR, ICMR and other funding agencies can follow! I think this will be the best way for promoting open access in India. Arun [Subbiah Arunachalam] "Funding agencies should appreciate that they can host their own archives. Last month, for example, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) launched its own archive, Science Inventory, to hold EPA-funded data and research papers. Even if all these files could be archived in various institutional and disciplinary repositories outside the EPA, using its own archive lets EPA monitor compliance with its OA requirement, facilitate discovery and retrieval, assure long-term preservation, and of course guarantee the sufficiency of the infrastructure."

1 0