- LIS-Forum - ncsi.iisc.ernet.in

Google: Search or Destroy?
by Thapar, Amit 17 Dec '05

17 Dec '05

Google: Search or Destroy? Google stands accused of copyright infringement by two major American authors’ associations and a French newswire. But the tools the company provides have done more to promote global access to information than any other. Here. librarians, lawyers, legislators and thinkers discuss the rights and wrongs of an internet giant. http://www.opendemocracy.net/media-copyrightlaw/google_3130.jsp amit@niper Cell: 9417419457 e-mail: amit_thapar(a)yahoo.com Google: Search or Destroy? Google stands accused of copyright infringement by two major American authors’ associations and a French newswire. But the tools the company provides have done more to promote global access to information than any other. Here. librarians, lawyers, legislators and thinkers discuss the rights and wrongs of an internet giant. http://www.opendemocracy.net/media-copyrightlaw/google_3130.jsp http://www.opendemocracy.net/media-copyrightlaw/google_3130.jsp mailto:amit@niper amit@niper Cell: 9417419457 e-mail: mailto:amit_thapar@yahoo.com amit_thapar(a)yahoo.com

1 0

Workshop on Scientific Journal Publishing in India
by Suvarsha Walters 17 Dec '05

17 Dec '05

NATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL PUBLISHING IN INDIA 10th and 11th February, 2006 Conducted by National Centre for Science Information, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore in collaboration with Public Knowledge Project, Univerity of British Columbia & Simon Fraser University, Canada supported by Asian Media and Information Centre, Singapore Dates: 10th and 11th February, 2006. ------ Content: ------- Aimed at academic publishers in India, including institutions and associations with Institutional Archives as well as journal publishers, the workshop aims to - Impart knowledge about OAI-PMH and the tools and techniques required to publish with OAI compliance. - Conduct hands-on session with the free journal management and publishing software, Open Journal Systems(OJS), which facilitates OAI-PMH indexing - Present talks by eminent persons on Open Access Publishing Registration Information: ------------------------ The workshop is open to Indian nationals employed in organizations, associations or private companies involved in academic and research publication OR have plans in the near future to start their own archives or publishing initiatives. Two members from the same organization are encouraged to participate. Additional members can be accommodated subject to the availability of seats. The number of seats is limited to 20 only. Registration Cost: ----------------- - No registration fee is charged to the participants. - Travel expenses to and from Bangalore should be borne by the participant or the sponsoring organization. - Accommodation, food, local transport and hospitality will be extended. Important dates: --------------- Last date for registration: 2nd January, 2006 Confirmation of registration to the participants: 15th January, 2006 Workshop Dates: 10th and 11th February, 2006 Registration form: ----------------- Available for download at: http:http://www.ncsi.iisc.ernet.in/ojs-workshop/register.pdf Brochure: -------- Available for download at: http://www.ncsi.iisc.ernet.in/ojs-workshop/brochure.pdf Workshop Website: ------- For more information check the URL: http://www.ncsi.iisc.ernet.in/ojs-workshop/ Contact: ------- Postal Address: National Centre for Science Information, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012 Phone: 080-22933273, 22932654 and 22932511 E-mail: sjpi(a)ncsi.iisc.ernet.in with regards, Suvarsha *********************************************************************** Suvarsha Walters, Project Assistant, National Centre for Science Information Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore - 560 012 INDIA Ph (Off): 080-23600271 / 22932511 Ph (Mobile): 98458 33694 E-mail: suvarsha_w(a)yahoo.com suvarsha(a)ncsi.iisc.ernet.in ************************************************************************

1 1

Re: [LIS-Forum] 2020 Shape of Academic and Research Libraries
by Mailing List Manager 17 Dec '05

17 Dec '05

Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:12:35 +0530 From: sathya <sathya(a)informindia.co.in> Sukhdev The scenerio imagined by you is very likely to happen and is already happening partially. Access models will break the current campus and IP-restriction barrior making authenticated access from home a reality. Academic & Research Librareis will either disappear or will become vendors. Considering the fact that higher education is gradually moving in the direction of student-funding, this scenerio is not unlikely. Access cost @10% of total educational cost looks very high, but very encouraging for libraries to turn vendors! Sathya ---------------------------------- N V Sathyanarayana Informatics (India) Ltd Bangalore 560003, India. www.informindia.co.in ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mailing List Manager" <mailman(a)ncsi.iisc.ernet.in> To: <lis-forum(a)ncsi.iisc.ernet.in> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 4:03 PM Subject: [LIS-Forum] 2020 Shape of Academic and Research Libraries > Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:33:59 +0530 > From: Sukhdev Singh <esukhdev(a)gmail.com> > > Year 2020 - Online is In and Paper is Out: > > Let us assume by the year 2020: > -- All content required for teaching, learning and research is available > online. > -- 24/7 Access is available for free or fee. > -- Online content is well indexed and rated. > -- Vendors provide single point access to premium content and > organized free content. > -- Access is available at a cost, which is less then 10 % of the total > educational cost of a postgraduate student. > > What would be shape [should I call future?] of Academic and Research > Libraries? > Any wild guesses? > > Let us dare to imagine. > > Comments Please. > > --Sukhdev Singh, NIC. > http://openmed.nic.in > > _______________________________________________ > LIS-Forum mailing list > LIS-Forum(a)ncsi.iisc.ernet.in > http://ncsi.iisc.ernet.in/mailman/listinfo/lis-forum >

1 0

OCLC Report : Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources
by Mailing List Manager 17 Dec '05

17 Dec '05

Date: 16 Dec 2005 07:12:43 -0000 From: Sharad Jadhav <email2sharad(a)rediffmail.com> �--apologies for cross postings-- An informative report from OCLC Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources http://www.oclc.org/reports/2005perceptions.htm Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources (2005) summarizes findings of an international study on information- seeking habits and preferences With extensive input from hundreds of librarians and OCLC staff, the OCLC Market Research team developed a project and commissioned Harris Interactive Inc. to survey a representative sample of information consumers. In June of 2005, we collected over 3,300 responses from information consumers in Australia, Canada, India, Singapore, the United Kingdom and the United States. The Perceptions report provides the findings and responses from the online survey in an effort to learn more about: Library use Awareness and use of library electronic resources The Internet search engine, the library and the librarian Free vs. for-fee information The "Library" brand The findings indicate that information consumers view libraries as places to borrow print books, but they are unaware of the rich electronic content they can access through libraries. Even though information consumers make limited use of these resources, they continue to trust libraries as reliable sources of information. Inside the Report Introduction Part 1: Libraries and Information Sources--Use, Familiarity and Favorability Part 2: Using the Library--In Person and Online Part 3: The Library Brand Part 4: Respondents' Advice to Libraries Part 5: Libraries--A "Universal" Brand? Conclusion Appendix A: Supporting Data Tables Appendix B: Sample Verbatim Comments About OCLC Regards, Sharad Jadhav, National Insurance Academy, Pune 411045, India sharad7703(a)yahoo.co.in

1 0

BetaNews: Librarians Voice Support for OpenDoc
by sandeep bhavsar 17 Dec '05

17 Dec '05

BetaNews: Librarians Voice Support for OpenDoc Dec 16, 2005, 22 :00 UTC (3 Talkback[s]) (584 reads) (Other stories by Ed Oswald) "Five library associations voiced their support for the use of OpenDocument (ODF) in Massachusetts this week, sending a letter to William Galvin, the Commonwealth's Secretary of State. In it, the groups say the open source format is the best choice, as everyone has access to its specifications. "Secretary Galvin has publicly derided the plan, saying he has 'grave concerns' about switching to OpenDocument from Microsoft Office. He also had been rumored to be pushing the various state agencies to decline to participate..." Regards Sandeep Bhavsar Librarian Dr.V.N.Bedekar Institute of Research and Management Studies Thane(W) 400601. MUMBAI PH : 25364492 25446554 25339868 Mo : 9867437438 email : sandeep.bhavsar(a)gmail.com --------------------------------- To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. BetaNews: Librarians Voice Support for OpenDoc Dec 16, 2005, 22 :00 UTC ( http://www.linuxtoday.com/infrastructure/2005121602226OSPB#talkback_area 3 Talkback[s] ) (584 reads) (Other stories by http://www.linuxtoday.com/search.php3?author=Ed:Oswald Ed Oswald ) "Five library associations voiced their support for the use of OpenDocument (ODF) in Massachusetts this week, sending a letter to William Galvin, the Commonwealth's Secretary of State. In it, the groups say the open source format is the best choice, as everyone has access to its specifications. "Secretary Galvin has publicly derided the plan, saying he has 'grave concerns' about switching to OpenDocument from Microsoft Office. He also had been rumored to be pushing the various state agencies to decline to participate..." Regards Sandeep Bhavsar Librarian Dr.V.N.Bedekar Institute of Research and Management Studies Thane(W) 400601. MUMBAI PH : 25364492 25446554 25339868 Mo : 9867437438 email : mailto:sandeep.bhavsar@gmail.com sandeep.bhavsar(a)gmail.com To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/uk/taglines/default/security_centre/*http://uk.… Yahoo! Security Centre .

1 0

Study: Wikipedia as accurate as Britannica
by sandeep bhavsar 17 Dec '05

17 Dec '05

Study: Wikipedia as accurate as Britannica Daniel Terdiman, December 16, 2005 The journal Nature says the open-access encyclopedia is about as accurate as the old standby. Over the last couple of weeks, Wikipedia, the free, open-access encyclopedia, has taken a great deal of flak in the press for problems related to the credibility of its authors and its general accountability. In particular, Wikipedia has taken hits for its inclusion, for four months, of an anonymously written article linking former journalist John Seigenthaler to the assassinations of Robert Kennedy and John F. Kennedy. At the same time, the blogosphere was buzzing for several days about podcasting pioneer Adam Curry's being accused of anonymously deleting references to others' seminal work on the technology. In response to situations like these and others in its history, Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales has always maintained that the service and its community are built around a self-policing and self-cleaning nature that is supposed to ensure its articles are accurate. Still, many critics have tried to downplay its role as a source of valid information and have often pointed to the Encyclopedia Britannica as an example of an accurate reference. For its study, Nature chose articles from both sites in a wide range of topics and sent them to what it called "relevant" field experts for peer review. The experts then compared the competing articles--one from each site on a given topic--side by side, but were not told which article came from which site. Nature got back 42 usable reviews from its field of experts. In the end, the journal found just eight serious errors, such as general misunderstandings of vital concepts, in the articles. Of those, four came from each site. They did, however, discover a series of factual errors, omissions or misleading statements. All told, Wikipedia had 162 such problems, while Britannica had 123. That averages out to 2.92 mistakes per article for Britannica and 3.86 for Wikipedia. "An expert-led investigation carried out by Nature--the first to use peer review to compare Wikipedia and Britannica's coverage of science," the journal wrote, "suggests that such high-profile examples (like the Seigenthaler and Curry situations) are the exception rather than the rule." And to Wales, while Britannica came out looking a little bit more accurate than Wikipedia, the Nature study was validation of his service's fundamental structure. "I was very pleased, just to see that (the study) was reasonably favorable," Wales told CNET News.com. "I think it provides, for us, a great counterpoint to the press coverage we've gotten recently, because it puts the focus on the broader quality and not just one article." He also acknowledged that the error rate for each encyclopedia was not insignificant, and added that he thinks such numbers demonstrate that broad review of encyclopedia articles is needed. He also said that the results belie the notion that Britannica is infallible. "I have very great respect for Britannica," Wales said. But "I think there is a general view among a lot of people that it has no errors, like, 'I read it in Britannica, it must be true.' It's good that people see that there are a lot of errors everywhere." To Britannica officials, however, the Nature results showed that Wikipedia still has a way to go. "The (Nature) article is saying that Wikipedia has a third more errors" than Britannica, said Jorge Cauz, president of Encyclopedia Britannica. But Cauz and editor in chief Dale Hoiberg also said they were concerned that Nature had not specified the problems that it had found in Britannica. "We've asked them a number of questions about the process they used," Hoiberg said. "They said in (their article) that the inaccuracies included errors, omissions and misleading statements. But there's no indication of how many of each. So we're very eager to look at that and explore it because we take it very seriously." Regards Sandeep Bhavsar Librarian Dr.V.N.Bedekar Institute of Research and Management Studies Thane(W) 400601. MUMBAI PH : 25364492 25446554 25339868 Mo : 9867437438 email : sandeep.bhavsar(a)gmail.com --------------------------------- Yahoo! Messenger NEW - crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail Study: Wikipedia as accurate as Britannica Daniel Terdiman, December 16, 2005 The journal Nature says the open-access encyclopedia is about as accurate as the old standby. Over the last couple of weeks, Wikipedia, the free, open-access encyclopedia, has taken a great deal of flak in the press for problems related to the credibility of its authors and its general accountability. In particular, Wikipedia has taken hits for its inclusion, for four months, of an anonymously written article linking former journalist John Seigenthaler to the assassinations of Robert Kennedy and John F. Kennedy. At the same time, the blogosphere was buzzing for several days about podcasting pioneer Adam Curry's being accused of anonymously deleting references to others' seminal work on the technology. In response to situations like these and others in its history, Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales has always maintained that the service and its community are built around a self-policing and self-cleaning nature that is supposed to ensure its articles are accurate. Still, many critics have tried to downplay its role as a source of valid information and have often pointed to the http://www.britannica.com/ Encyclopedia Britannica as an example of an accurate reference. For its study, http://www.nature.com/news/2005/051212/full/438900a.html Nature chose articles from both sites in a wide range of topics and sent them to what it called "relevant" field experts for peer review. The experts then compared the competing articles--one from each site on a given topic--side by side, but were not told which article came from which site. Nature got back 42 usable reviews from its field of experts. In the end, the journal found just eight serious errors, such as general misunderstandings of vital concepts, in the articles. Of those, four came from each site. They did, however, discover a series of factual errors, omissions or misleading statements. All told, Wikipedia had 162 such problems, while Britannica had 123. That averages out to 2.92 mistakes per article for Britannica and 3.86 for Wikipedia. "An expert-led investigation carried out by Nature--the first to use peer review to compare Wikipedia and Britannica's coverage of science," the journal wrote, "suggests that such high-profile examples (like the Seigenthaler and Curry situations) are the exception rather than the rule." And to Wales, while Britannica came out looking a little bit more accurate than Wikipedia, the Nature study was validation of his service's fundamental structure. "I was very pleased, just to see that (the study) was reasonably favorable," Wales told CNET News.com. "I think it provides, for us, a great counterpoint to the press coverage we've gotten recently, because it puts the focus on the broader quality and not just one article." He also acknowledged that the error rate for each encyclopedia was not insignificant, and added that he thinks such numbers demonstrate that broad review of encyclopedia articles is needed. He also said that the results belie the notion that Britannica is infallible. "I have very great respect for Britannica," Wales said. But "I think there is a general view among a lot of people that it has no errors, like, 'I read it in Britannica, it must be true.' It's good that people see that there are a lot of errors everywhere." To Britannica officials, however, the Nature results showed that Wikipedia still has a way to go. "The (Nature) article is saying that Wikipedia has a third more errors" than Britannica, said Jorge Cauz, president of Encyclopedia Britannica. But Cauz and editor in chief Dale Hoiberg also said they were concerned that Nature had not specified the problems that it had found in Britannica. "We've asked them a number of questions about the process they used," Hoiberg said. "They said in (their article) that the inaccuracies included errors, omissions and misleading statements. But there's no indication of how many of each. So we're very eager to look at that and explore it because we take it very seriously." Regards Sandeep Bhavsar Librarian Dr.V.N.Bedekar Institute of Research and Management Studies Thane(W) 400601. MUMBAI PH : 25364492 25446554 25339868 Mo : 9867437438 email : mailto:sandeep.bhavsar@gmail.com sandeep.bhavsar(a)gmail.com http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/uk/taglines/default/messenger/*http://uk.messen… Yahoo! Messenger NEW - crystal clear PC to PC http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/uk/taglines/default/messenger/*http://uk.messen… calling worldwide with voicemail

1 0

SITE FOR LIBRARIANS
by Suresh Kumar Tejomurtula 16 Dec '05

16 Dec '05

Dear Student friends, Am a final student in LIS from Andhra University, I would like to let all the students know the information I've found. This a site for the students who are new to Internet http://www.lii.org/ Have a note of it friends, And I hope students from all the corners will share their informative knowledge with the remaining. Regards T.suresh Kumar Dept. Library & Information science Andhra University Visakhapatnam. Dear Student friends, Am a final student in LIS from Andhra University, I would like to let all the students know the information I've found. This a site for the students who are new to Internet http://www.lii.org/ http://www.lii.org/ Have a note of it friends, And I hope students from all the corners will share their informative knowledge with the remaining. Regards T.suresh Kumar Dept. Library & Information science Andhra University Visakhapatnam.

1 0

NET JUNE'05 RESULTS OUT!!!
by rupesh kumar 16 Dec '05

16 Dec '05

Dear All, The results of June 2005 UGC-NET exam is available on the UGC website http://www.ugc.ac.in/inside/net.html Congratulations to the successful candidates and good luck to aspirants. Regards, RUPESH KUMAR.A. DEPARTMENT OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE BANGALORE UNIVERSITY __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com Dear All, The results of June 2005 UGC-NET exam is available on the UGC website http://www.ugc.ac.in/inside/net.html Congratulations to the successful candidates and good luck to aspirants. Regards, http://www.bub.ac.in/buLogo.jpg RUPESH KUMAR.A. DEPARTMENT OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE BANGALORE UNIVERSITY __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

1 0

New Stuff
by Thapar, Amit 16 Dec '05

16 Dec '05

Library, Librarian and Librarianship Quotes http://informatics.buffalo.edu/faculty/ellison/quotes/libquotesac.html There's a lot of material for sig files here; you can also submit your own favorite quotes. Merriam-Webster Open Dictionary http://www3.merriam-webster.com/opendictionary/ "where you can 1) submit and share entries that aren't already in our Online Dictionary, and 2) browse entries submitted by other members of the Merriam-Webster Online community." Among the recent submissions: "blogosphere" (THAT isn't in the dictionary yet?), "craptastic," "geekmeister," "chillax." amit@niper Cell: 9417419457 e-mail: amit_thapar(a)yahoo.com Library, Librarian and Librarianship Quotes http://informatics.buffalo.edu/faculty/ellison/quotes/libquotesac.html http://informatics.buffalo.edu/faculty/ellison/quotes/libquotesac.html There's a lot of material for sig files here; you can also submit your own favorite quotes. Merriam-Webster Open Dictionary http://www3.merriam-webster.com/opendictionary/ http://www3.merriam-webster.com/opendictionary/ "where you can 1) submit and share entries that aren't already in our Online Dictionary, and 2) browse entries submitted by other members of the Merriam-Webster Online community." Among the recent submissions: "blogosphere" (THAT isn't in the dictionary yet?), "craptastic," "geekmeister," "chillax." mailto:amit@niper amit@niper Cell: 9417419457 e-mail: mailto:amit_thapar@yahoo.com amit_thapar(a)yahoo.com

1 0

From libraries to 'libratories'
by Mailing List Manager 15 Dec '05

15 Dec '05

Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:57:29 +0530 From: "Thapar, Amit" <amitt(a)niper.ac.in> Source: First Monday Volume 10, Number 12 - December 5th 2005 >From libraries to 'libratories' by Leo Waaijers http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue10_12/waaijers/ Abstract: While the eighties of the last century were a time of local automation for libraries and the nineties the decade in which libraries embraced the Internet and the Web, now is the age in which the big search engines and institutional repositories are gaining a firm footing. This heralds a new era in both the evolution of scholarly communication and its agencies themselves, i.e. the libraries. Until now libraries and publishers have developed a digital variant of existing processes and products,i.e. catalogues posted on the Web, scanned copies of articles, e-mail notification about acquisitions or expired lending periods, or traditional journals in a digital jacket. However, the new OAI repositories and services based upon them have given rise to entirely new processes and products, libraries transforming themselves into partners in setting up virtual learning environments, building an institution's digital showcase, maintaining academics' personal Web sites, designing refereed portals and - further into the future - taking part in organising virtual research environments or collaboratories. Libraries are set to metamorphose into 'libratories', an imaginary word to express their combined functions of library, repository and collaboratory. In such environments scholarly communication will be liberated from its current copyright bridle while its coverage will be both broader - including primary data, audiovisuals and dynamic models - and deeper, with cross-disciplinary analyses of methodologies and applications of instruments. Universities will make it compulsory to store in their institutional repositories the results of research conducted within their walls for purposes of academic reporting, review committees, and other modes of clarification and explanation. Big search engines will provide access to this profusion of information and organise its mass customization.

1 0