Dear Friends, NET June 2012 objective mode exam was good. I could see happy in all participants face while exit from exam center. The questions are good and capable to evaluate the knowledge of library professionals and students. The questions represented theoretical aspect and practical aspect. Previous descriptive questions were not such type and only capable to test bookish knowledge. I really agree with Sri. Sunny Joseph's comments. You can see no equality in former UGC NET results. Paper valuation is not a serious job of UGC. I still remember candidates compare UGC NET exam as a lottery ticket play. After exam, they pray and wait for result. After the result announcement,few winners became happy and other became sad. And again they try their luck next time. On the way, UGC bagged huge amount. Winners of NET holders in descriptive exam think that former exam system was good. In majority of cases, average presentation and good hand writing decide the winners. I challenge them to apply once again and win NET. In my view candidates with average hand writing could not made impression in paper valuation. We can consider the past UGC NET exams as a hand writing competition !! -- Vimal Kumar V. Mahatma Gandhi University Library Kottayam, Kerala- 686 560 Web: http://www.vimalkumar.org Blog: http://linuxhalwa.blogspot.com http://kohageek.blogspot.in --------------------------------------------------------------------------- "I forget what I was taught. I only remember what I have learnt" -Patrick White -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.