I would offer my opinion that for our profession to be recognized we need
the following:
1) Revamping of the school library system, where the librarians and
teachers must work together to introduce students to the concept of
a) Extra reading on their subjects (introducing the principle that just
mugging from textbooks is not knowledge)
b) Extra reading out of their subjects - fiction / non fiction / reference
sources etc to have a rounded off knowledge
Reading should be done from a combination of print and online - make
students understand that everything is not available online, but some
things are only available in print, some only online
2) In UG curriculum - have a paper on information literacy - compulsory for
all
3) Librarian Science courses need to include options for specialization
after the MLIS. Coming from a medical library background - I know how much
there is to learn in this field; it is never ending. Obviously there will
be the same amount of learning to do in Engineering, Law etc - fields of
librarianship.
4) Continuous upgradation in respective fields - including general
librarianship. Only excellent general librarians can work with special
librarians to give their patrons any special help they may need from time
to time
Upgradation of librarians should include the need for good teaching
practices and excellent management skills. The librarian of today has to be
able to teach academicians and students, and ensure that every resource is
utilized 100%
It is all a vicious circle - and only when we present a proper picture to
the right bodies and keep pushing for changes, will things happen. This
should include - how we can create a new generation of librarians only if
the bodies plan not only for equal status, but for promoting the library
science courses with the attraction of well paid jobs. The current
generation of librarians need to keep upgrading themselves to be as good as
the best Professors, if not more.
Vasumathi Sriganesh
QMed Knowledge Foundation
(Trust - Reg No: E-24663)
A-3, Shubham Centre, Cardinal Gracious Road
Chakala, Andheri East, Mumbai 400099
Tel: 91-22-40054474 Mob: +919867292230
Web: www.qmed.org.in http://www.qmedkf.org.in/ www.indianmedicalsites.in
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Vasanth
Dear Sir/Madam,
It has been often deliberated in many professional forums that (at least in Karnataka) higher education department such as Department of Collegiate Education (DCE) should introduce LIS syllabus (information literacy) as a subsidiary paper in undergraduate course curriculum.
Karnataka State College Librarians Association (KSCLA) has been in the forefront on this issue for some time. In fact, in 2012 KSCLA organized one day conference on the theme “Information Literacy”. Then Karnataka Higher Education Minister Sri. C.T. Ravi was invited to inaugurate the conference. It was done mainly to place a request to introduce the LIS syllabus in under graduate course curriculum. Even after this as well, in many of the conferences our professionals have deliberated on this issue. Though this is an important issue, does merely introducing LIS syllabus in the curriculum change the image of the libraries and librarians?
Libraries even at the higher education level in India have not given enough importance. It has often been a neglected entity in college environment. At the behest of UGC, librarians are appointing for managing the library in higher education institutions mainly in undergraduate colleges. Otherwise, some secondary division clerk would have been put in place to run the show (there were/are cases of non-professionals managing college libraries).
Of late, professionals entering the LIS profession are demanding the equal status on par with teachers at the higher education level. Librarians are today on par with teachers in terms of financial benefits (eg., pay scale) but in terms of professional status librarians have not been seen as equal to teachers. Introducing a LIS curriculum in undergraduate colleges is not a solution for this.
We as professionals should demand for better infrastructure and human resource to manage libraries. Most of the college libraries (in Karanataka) even lack basic facilities such as proper buildings to store and organize books. Man power is a big problem librarians have to manage everything on their own. There is a no supportive man power to manage libraries. This has dented the image of the libraries.
Introduction of LIS curriculum in undergraduate courses would be an additional baggage rather a benefit to librarians. After teaching, librarians have to work again in the library. Who would there to manage it? Instead of this let us fight for our professional rights (for proper facilities) to be remain as library professionals. Let is once again remember the adage “librarians are the teacher’s teacher”. Merely having the designation of assistant professor of LIS would not change the image of the profession.
(Views are personal) ------------------------- With best wishes
Vasantha Raju N. GFGC-Periyapatna Mysore
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________ LIS-Forum mailing list LIS-Forum@ncsi.iisc.ernet.in http://ncsi.iisc.ernet.in/mailman/listinfo/lis-forum
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.