Thank you friends for responding to my post on "Why can't GoogleScholar be like Open J-Gate / OAIster "< http://sukhdev.blogspot.com/2006/03/why-cant-google-scholar-be-like-open-j.html>to various Groups as well as on my blog < http://sukhdev.blogspot.com>. Some of the issues highlighted by you are presented towards theend of this message. My posted was purely from an end user's point of view. Who is notinterested what all Google Scholar, can offer and whether it helps incitation analysis [1]. The requirement was plain and simple "Resultset should be restricted to Free / Open Full Text ScholarlyLiterature". The purpose is to save unproductive "clicks" to paid /locked literature. Dr. S N Sarbadhikari [4] is quite near when hesuggests adding "open access full text" words to the query as such.However, it will remove many useful hits where these words are notpart of the text. Better would have been that an option is provided torestrict to free / open literature in the advanced search interface. Ihave written to Anurag Acharya of Google Scholar to provide such anoption< http://sukhdev.blogspot.com/2006/03/suggestion-for-google-scholar.html >.It up to him -- to ignore the suggestion or profit from it. I am myself a fan of Google Scholar. Who knows ? - in future it couldeven beat Web of Science.< http://sukhdev.blogspot.com/2006/02/will-google-scholar-beat-web-of.html >. The way it is negotiating with Journal Publishers for their content[2] as well as entering into agreements with libraries to provide fulltexts [3] -- the future could be near. Integration with OpenURLresolvers is also an interesting trend to watch [5]. References: [1] Sh. Jitendra N. Dash< http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/medlib/message/263 > "I found the following write-up by Mr. Singh is interesting but heavoided the strong point of Google Scholar(GS), free citationretrieval search engine." [2] JK Vijayakumar< http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/medlib/message/264 > "Google Scholar is negotiating with Journal Publishers for gettinginto their server, and harvest their ToC, Abstract and reference partsof each article. When GS comes out with its full version, any one cansearch for Scholarly literature, from the vast array of Free and Paidjournals, at the same time and at single place. The beauty of itsCitation search adds GS's expected acceptance among Academia." [3] He further refers to the following News Item:< http://www.bl.uk/news/2006/pressrelease20060302.html > "The internet's search engine and the world's greatest researchlibrary are joining forces to offer researchers, students andacademics desktop delivery of millions of full text scholarly researcharticles.
From today, searches on Google Scholar (http://www.scholar.google.com)will include links to the British Library's document delivery service.Search results will be matched against the Library's holdings andwhere a match is made, users will have the option to obtain articlesheld via the British Library's online document ordering interface,British Library Direct (http://direct.bl.uk) " [4] Dr. S N Sarbadhikari< http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/indmedtraining/message/678 > " I tried to test Scholar.Google with the search phrase: "benchmarkingorganizations open access full text" and could get access to many freefull text articles from the very first result page. " [5] Saiful Amin < http://ncsi.iisc.ernet.in/pipermail/lis-forum/2006-March/003642.html >Highlights out how Google Scholar can be integrated with OpenURL resolvers. --Sukhdev Singh, NIC.http://openmed.nic.in