Sir, please help circulating the message among LIS forum professional colleagues
Best Regards
Koteswara Tumuluru(KT)
Telephone: +91-44-6623 6739
Mobile: 09840823377
-----Original Message-----
From: Koteswara_Tumuluru
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 7:59 PM
To: lis-forum-bounces@ncsi.iisc.ernet.in; LIS forum
Subject: RE: [LIS-Forum] CELEBRATING 100 YEARS OF LIBRARY EDUCATION IN INDIA: APERSPECTIVE
Dear Colleagues,
Thanks for the informative debate. I wish to submit my own perspective:
It is heartening to note that LIS education is celebrating 100 years in India. I think, LIS schools have come a long way and are changing periodically as per the times in imparting education, training and research. Thanks to our teachers and professors who have contributed to these changes which will continue in future. This is a collective responsibility of many stakeholders like academicians, practicing librarians, policy makers and UGC/government bodies. Yet there is a limitation for LIS schools to impart all the needed know-how as some of practical skills needs to be learnt on the job.
I think repositioning LIS education in India is already in a feel-good progressive stage and will continue to evolve as a process. I agree that our professionals need to follow up with UGC and policy makers in launching LIS or iSchools in the newly formed universities in the country highlighting the need and potential of this professional study to the country.
Regarding name change for Library and Librarian, I feel it is crucial for special and corporate libraries and librarians. In fact Corporate librarians are increasingly being referred as Head-IRU, Information Manager, Directors of Learning Resource Centers or Project Lead - Information Services etc. This is because these libraries need to justify ROI and prove that this service function is directly or indirectly adding to the business growth which is true & critical.
Information professionals are taking roles in L&D by procuring eLearning courses hosting on Learning Management Systems on intranets and are doubling up as Learning Consultants and Knowledge Managers. This would be a healthy and growing opportunity for the profession. The scenario in Public and Academic libraries also is improving as we are impacting the core function of those institutions. Thus I do not see any identity crisis for the Profession and Professionals in this knowledge-intensive economy led by many/growing competent, tech-savvy LIS leaders across the country.
Thank you,
Best Regards,
Koteswara Tumuluru(KT)
Head Librarian & Learning Consultant
Mahindra Satyam
CHENNAI - 600 018.
Telephone: +91-44-6623 6739
Mobile: 09840823377
-----Original Message-----
From: lis-forum-bounces@ncsi.iisc.ernet.in [mailto:lis-forum-bounces@ncsi.iisc.ernet.in] On Behalf Of Enukonda Rama Reddy
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 5:33 PM
To: sathya@informindia.co.in; Vasanth; lis-forum-bounces@ncsi.iisc.ernet.in; LIS forum
Subject: Re: [LIS-Forum] CELEBRATING 100 YEARS OF LIBRARY EDUCATION IN INDIA: APERSPECTIVE
It is necessary to debate on this issue with focus. I feel Dr. Ranganathan would have coined a new name for us, if he was to be alive today.
1. LIS is no longer a single discipline and it has grown into multidisciplinary in nature with knowledge skills needed from many related disciplines.
2. Name is important to reflect the work that we do and we need to focus on it. When the concept of Library is changing with time. We need to look at changing the name with appropriate and acceptable to all including the organizations where we are part of it. Uniform title for Library and Librarian need to be coined.
3. Name change without skill improvements with the changing times will not help the profession. Skill improvement should come from the LIS departments or with add-on specialized courses with emphasis on hands-on experience or involving in self-learning to start with.
4. Teaching and Research areas should cover contemporary and futuristic areas/ issues with more specializations and less emphasis on traditional areas/issues
5. Teaching Departments should take the lead in upgrading their skills to handle the new areas. Can we make it possible. It will be good for the departments to recruit or invite people with expertize from other areas to teach and involve in research because of the multidisciplinary nature of our discipline. They do need infrastructure for it.
We need to look unitedly involving teachers and practitioners to focus on the issue raised by Mr. Sathyanarayana from Informatics.
rama reddy
Dr. E. Rama Reddy, Ph D
Flat # 4 Siddartha Apartment
22 Santosh Nagar Colony
Mehdipatnam
Hyderabad- 500 028. India
mobile: 9000955729
enukondar@yahoo.co.in
enukondar@gmail.com
________________________________
From: "sathya@informindia.co.in"
To: Vasanth ; lis-forum-bounces@ncsi.iisc.ernet.in; LIS forum
Sent: Tuesday, 19 April 2011 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: [LIS-Forum] CELEBRATING 100 YEARS OF LIBRARY EDUCATION IN INDIA: APERSPECTIVE
Let us debate on this:
"If Ranganathan were to be alive today, would he have come out with a new name for LIBRARY and LIBRARIAN?"
Sathyanarayana
Informatics
Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel
-----Original Message-----
From: Vasanth
Sender: lis-forum-bounces@ncsi.iisc.ernet.in
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 01:06:24
To: LIS forum
Subject: [LIS-Forum] CELEBRATING 100 YEARS OF LIBRARY EDUCATION IN INDIA: A
PERSPECTIVE
Dear Sir/Madam,
As we all know the year 2011 mark the completion of 100 years of LIS Education
in India. Though LIS education was started in 1911, LIS education in India got a
huge boost with the Ranganthan’s metamorphic shift to library science from
mathematics. Ranganathan’s path breaking efforts have laid a strong foundation
for the growth of library movement in India and elsewhere. However the
post-Ranganathan era has gone through a tremendous change with advent of
information technology and the Internet blurring the space and time constraints.
The easy availability of Information in varied formats has put LIS education in
a threshold of radical change. But there is not much discuss on how LIS
education has to reposition itself in a constant changing information
environment. The following points discussed below bring out some of the problems
that the LIS education is facing in India.
· LIS Research in India:Since 1957, India library professionals have
significantly contributed for the growth of LIS research in India. More than
1000 Ph Ds have been awarded across the country (Manjunatha, 2011). The numbers
seems incredible but the quantum of the research has been limited to largely few
areas, mainly Bibliometrics, Library Management and Service, Information Seeking
Behavior or User Studies. Still research in these areas has been taken up by
many scholars. This indicated that India LIS research has not ventured into
other areas of research as it should have been. Many of the areas that mentioned
above have been repeated with slight changes. Many of the studies have used
survey research largely questionnaire method. Other methodological approaches
have not been employed in many research reports. The lack of strong theoretical
approach to the LIS research has hampered the Indian LIS research at the global
map in the post Ranganathan era.
· Missing S. R. Ranganathan’s legacy : Today we clearly miss the legacy
of S. R. Ranganathan. Ranganathan’s contribution to the growth of the LIS
profession put India in global LIS domain. But today intellectual caliber and
leadership quality of Ranganathan is missing in Indian LIS community. To revive
the LIS in India we need people of Ranganathan’s stature, who can bring
leadership quality to the LIS community with strong professional bent of mind.
· LIS Education and Changing Information Landscape : Because of changing
information landscape, digital information replacing the analog form has
resulted in changing LIS curriculum to suit the changing information
environment. Even many of the library schools in US and other part of the world
have removed the word “library” and have named their LIS schools as “iSchools”
(information Schools). But not much discussion has taken place in India on this,
although ISiM (International School of Information Management) has started
iSchool movement in India in 2005. But, how LIS education is going to serve the
net savvy information users and how LIS professionals reposition themselves in a
changing information landscape is largely missing in Indian LIS discourse.
· Universities Reluctant to Start LIS Schools : Another impending
problem of the LIS is, many of the recently established universities have not
keen on starting LIS schools. We have more than 500 plus universities in India,
but only 95 universities have found to be offered Ph D program in LIS
(Manjunatha, 2011). The reluctancy can be attributed to the changing information
environment. Moreover, library education or library profession has never been
on par with the teachers. Library profession has been seen as a supporting
mechanism rather on par with teaching professions. There is a need to understand
and examine why new universities are not keen on opening LIS schools.
· Identity crisis: LIS profession is facing the problem of identity
crisis. The library science, information science, knowledge management and
other similar nomenclature have been part of the LIS discourse. But we have not
been able to identify ourselves in one umbrella. The one set of professionals
who are part of traditional (college or university) libraries are part of
library profession and other who work in special and corporate libraries are
part of information or knowledge management profession. The ambiguity of
various nomenclatures associated with library and information profession has
created identity crisis in LIS field.
This is appropriate time to discuss some of the issues raised above to herald a
new era of Library and Information Science education in India.
-------------------------
With best wishes
Vasantha Raju N
GFGC-Periyapatna
Mysore
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
