Dear Friends,
This is not the case of opposing the objective type questions in third
paper. There are already two objective type papers to test General and
subject knowledge of the candidate.
I think NET examination is not only to test the candidates' general &
subject knowledge, but to evaluate how they can interpret and explain the
specific ideas in most simplest manner to others (Especially to their
students).
I dont think the persons who are very good in answering objective type
questions but having less idea in interpreting consepts can become good
lectures. The 3rd paper in the current scheme is as important as 1st & 2nd
papers.
In my opinion, focus should be given to the evaluation of third paper in
current scheme.
With Regards,
Seena V
Got. Brennen College
Thalassery, Kerala.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Vimal Kumar
Dear Friends,
I observed from the discussion that people who already qualified UGC NET do not like to change the pattern of current examination. And they are opposing objective type questions in third paper.
In my opinion, evaluation of third paper in current scheme is not serious and it is too weak. The result is number of winners are very low. How can an evaluator read out all answers sheets within minimum time? I dont think all failed candidates are below average standard.
In my opinion, total number of papers should be cut down to two. One general paper and second paper should be subject oriented. Regards, -- Vimal Kumar V. Mahatma Gandhi University Library Kottayam, Kerala- 686 560 Web: http://www.vimalkumar.org Blog: http://linuxhalwa.blogspot.com --------------------------------------------------------------------------- "I forget what I was taught. I only remember what I have learnt" -Patrick White
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.