From Peter Suber's blog: What form of OA should universities recommend to faculty? Jonathan Zittrain gave his inaugural lecture yesterday as Oxford's first Professor of Internet Governance and Regulation. His title: The future of the Internet - and how to stop it. A webcast is available. The Oxford press release contains this tidbit: Another issue explored during Professor Zittrain's lecture, was the potential of the Internet for scholars and students around the world. He argued: 'Universities should encourage or even require their faculties to publish in open access journals and to publish working papers ahead of final drafts, so that their work is not locked up by some journal copyrights which are increasingly testing the budgets of libraries who wish to subscribe.' Comment. I applaud Zittrain for endorsing OA in his inaugural lecture. However, universities should require deposit in OA repositories not publication in OA journals (although they should encourage publication OA journals). (1) There aren't enough OA journals today and there won't be for some time. OA journals can easily grow in size but cannot as easily grow in number or scope. (2) Even when there are enough OA journals and they cover every research niche, a requirement to publish in OA journals would limit the freedom of authors to publish in the journals of their choice. (3) If the goal is OA, then universities needn't steer faculty away from subscription journals, at least when these journals consent to the OA archiving of peer-reviewed postprints, as about 70% of them do today. By contrast, (4) OA repositories are available today; (5) they scale quickly and easily; (6) they are compatible with the survival of conventional journals; and (7) they are compatible with author freedom to submit their work wherever they like. These are the reasons why all the OA mandates by funding agencies (public and private) focus on OA repositories, not OA journals. From Peter Suber's blog: What form of OA should universities recommend to faculty? http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/zittrain.html Jonathan Zittrain gave his inaugural lecture yesterday as Oxford's first Professor of Internet Governance and Regulation. His title: The future of the Internet and how to stop it . A http://webcast.oii.ox.ac.uk/?view=Webcast&ID=20060411_141 webcast is available. The Oxford http://www.physorg.com/news65281929.html press release contains this tidbit: Another issue explored during Professor Zittrains lecture, was the potential of the Internet for scholars and students around the world. He argued: Universities should encourage or even require their faculties to publish in open access journals and to publish working papers ahead of final drafts, so that their work is not locked up by some journal copyrights which are increasingly testing the budgets of libraries who wish to subscribe. Comment . I applaud Zittrain for endorsing OA in his inaugural lecture. However, universities should require deposit in http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm#archives OA repositories not publication in http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm#journals OA journals (although they should encourage publication OA journals). (1) There aren't enough OA journals today and there won't be for some time. OA journals can easily grow in size but cannot as easily grow in number or scope. (2) Even when there are enough OA journals and they cover every research niche, a requirement to publish in OA journals would limit the freedom of authors to publish in the journals of their choice. (3) If the goal is OA, then universities needn't steer faculty away from subscription journals, at least when these journals consent to the OA archiving of peer-reviewed postprints, as about http://romeo.eprints.org/stats.php 70% of them do today. By contrast , (4) OA repositories are available today; (5) they scale quickly and easily; (6) they are compatible with the survival of conventional journals; and (7) they are compatible with author freedom to submit their work wherever they like. These are the reasons why all the OA mandates by funding agencies (public and private) focus on OA repositories, not OA journals.