[LIS-Forum] Damning indictment of LIS profession
K.Sankaraiah
sankariahk at dataone.in
Wed Apr 26 06:37:55 IST 2006
----- Original Message -----
From: "K.Sankaraiah" <sankariahk at dataone.in>
Subject: Re: [LIS-Forum] Damning indictment of LIS profession
> Dear Moderator,
> I would be most grateful for posting the following mail.
> Let me begin by thanking all the professional colleagues for their
> comments on the subject. I'm most happy to see Dr Vyasamurthy also
> picked up the Hindu article and providing a link to it, felt that some of
> the librarians need to be sensitised to the concept of service.
> I hope to be permitted to sum up the whole little debate. The comments
> varied from a) some users are rude and selfish, try to pull their weight
> around b) library is a temple and so access should not be restricted c) we
> have not heard the other side of the story and so should not rush to judge
> and d) every one should observe rules. In fact d) seems to be the dominant
> factor. One cannot the dispute the validity of these claims; but equally
> we cannot dispute the suppremacy of service for our profession, as also
> for many otherprofessions. How can we forget the basic tenets of
> librarianship as enunciated by the greatest library thinker of all times
> viz books are for use; every book its reader; every reader his book and
> save the time of the reader. Can we afford to take a confrontationist
> stand of "them and we" and cry for eye for an eye and tooth for the tooth.
> We talk of library marketing today like any commercial enterprize. We
> say library user is a customer. Most of the librarians in the West say, by
> calling the library user a customer, we have promoted them to a higher
> position.
> Customers come in all shapes and sizes. There are awkward customers and
> difficult customers. But is it not a fact that as long as we are behind
> the 'counter' ie the Lakshman Rekha, we cannot think of' tit for tat'.
> Even when we know that a particular customer is in the wrong, we cannot
> afford to vent our spleen on him or her. In this context, Gandhiji is
> often quoted. 'We are in business because of the customer' and not the
> other way round.
> Yes, there are rules. But rule are there to prevent misuse or abuse and
> not to prevent genuine use or user.
> I'm very distressed to see my friend, Prof Lakshman Rao saying that rules
> have to be followed. He says he was not allowed entry to Bibliotheca
> National. But I'm sure he would not have been asked to prove his
> bonafides. The library staff there, must have explained the restrictions
> in a most polite way. I had a similar experiance. First time I could not
> get in to the British Museum Library in London. But the staff there did
> every thing possible to enable me to have access to it. They advised me
> to get a letter from the British Council, which I did. I could see they
> were inspired by the ideals of service. Mr Lakshman Rao is a respected
> teacher and trainer of librarians and has been in the field for a long
> time and if a teacher takes the stand that he has taken, we need not be
> surprised by the attitude of some of us.
> In the present case of Ranjit Lal, to me it appears, he wanted to consult
> the documents in the National Museum Library. I visited its website which
> looks very impressive, claims a stock of two lakh documents. The name of
> the librarian (?) given there is one Ms Pratibha Parashar. She might not
> have been the staff to attending Ranjit Lal. In the interests of our
> profession, could some one in Delhi please find out what had happened.
> As I said in my first mail, because of isolated instances like this, the
> whole profession is blamed. By and large, librarians are good and
> service-minded. Society is changing fast, much faster than any one can
> imagine. We have come a long away from preservation to active
> dissemination of information ( proactive is the word most appropriate, I
> think) and I hope we have long ceased to be policing our possessions.
> Social forces like competition are driving us to provide quality service
> to our users. Technology is helping us today in ways undreamt of
> previously to help us in this noble mission of ours, which ultimately
> contributes to personal, individual and national development.
> I'm grateful to LIS-FORUM for opportunities to share our views in matters
> concerning our profession. You are doing a wonderful service !! Thank
> you.
> Sankaraiah, K
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "K.Sankaraiah" <sankariahk at dataone.in>
> To: <lis-forum at ncsi.iisc.ernet.in>
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 7:28 AM
> Subject: [LIS-Forum] Damning indictment of LIS profession
>
>
>> Dear Moderator,
>> Grateful for publishing the following in lis-forum.
>>
>> I wish to draw the attention of our professional colleagues to an article
>> under the Musings, entitled "What are your bonafides?", by Mr Ranjit Lal
>> in the Magazine section of the Hindu of 9 April, 2006. I think all of us
>> should read this and ponder over the implications. I'm sure many of us
>> must have already done so.
>> The gist of the article is the author, obviously not a member,
>> approached the librarian of the National Museum library in Delhi for help
>> and the librarian promptly asked him to prove his bonafides. Ranjit Lal
>> contributes articles to the Hindu and probably does so to many other
>> renowned newspapers and journals. In any case he told the librarian that
>> he uses the Teen Murthi library and the British Council Library in Delhi
>> and he is working on a book for which he needs help. According to the
>> article, this did not cut ice with the librarian.
>>
>> This article, I believe, is a damning indictment of the unhelpful and
>> bureaucratic attitude of the librarian of one of the premier institutions
>> of the country. It should rouse the collective conscience of the LIS
>> profession and force us to think if in today's competitive world we can
>> afford to have this kind of unhelpful attitude. Even otherwise, isn't
>> service to the user at the centre of our profession ?. The aurthor
>> rightly says the public pays for librarian's salary, allowances and the
>> innumerable cups of tea, justifiable and just righteous indignation!!.
>>
>> How do we change this attitude?. I was under the impression that things
>> have changed and we all swear by service. All the works of SRR
>> emphasise this aspect. Because of instaces like this,( I hope they are
>> isolated) the whole profession gets the stick. And this is why society
>> does not give us the status that an intellectual profession like ours
>> deserves.
>>
>> We need to do something here.
>>
>> Sankaraiah, K
>> Immediate past President of the Madras Library Association (MALA)
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LIS-Forum mailing list
>> LIS-Forum at ncsi.iisc.ernet.in
>> http://ncsi.iisc.ernet.in/mailman/listinfo/lis-forum
>>
>
>
>
More information about the LIS-Forum
mailing list